Art is the proper task of life

{June 2, 2007}   On Marriage and Men

This post started off as a comment on one of Sumera’s recent post but evolved into a post. There were a few points in Sumera’s post that caught my attention. First marriage being less appealing for women as they have more opportunities to be financially independent. Different people marry for different reasons and financial security is one of the main reasons, especially for women. (Note: That’s why I don’t diss doctor hunting aunties most of the time.) And there is nothing wrong with this reason since financial security is a very important thing in life. However those people who do have financial security sometimes seek something else. Reminds me of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. So allow me to put on my feminist hat and let me state that there may not be an essentialist essence of marriage. In other words there is no one particular arrangement of man and women being bound to one another that will satisfy all situations. Different arrangement may suffice for different eras and cultures. This should not be taken to mean that I saying something against any particular conception or arrangement of marriage. Socio-economic circumstances and life history are things that dictate such arrangements. Polygamy was once thought to be normal but now its either strictly forbidden in many countries or even looked down upon in some communities where it is legal. There may have been circumstances in the past that may have required it but circumstances change especially when men start exploiting something which is permissible for their own selfish ends. I always say if something (anything?) is allowed people, both men and women but in this case mostly men, will find ways to exploit. That’s the problem with rules and systems. They are essential but they also rise to loopholes, hence the law of unintended consequences.

Now the point about having different expectations for the son-in-law and for the daughter-in-law. I have noticed that the problem is almost universal but seems to be more pronounced in the desi culture (or it could just be the case that I have noticed this more before I know more about the desi culture.) Most of these problems arise because people fail to put themselves in the position of their daughter in laws (DILs) and the same applies for DILs in some case. It could just be part of the human tendency of not readily taking another person’s perspective. Do men get more from marriages? The short answer – yes selfish men do get more, most of the time anyway. I remember the true case of this desi woman whose husband used to regularly beat her, did not do work and act all pious in the mosque. ($#@ nonsense in the name of religion.) She did not contact the police for a long time because she was afraid of losing her children. Most other people also expected her to have patience (sabr). From that man’s perspective, life was a blast. He had a servant whom he did not have to pay anything who cooked, cleaned and hey he could even had sex with her in addition to a mistress that he had. What about the woman? She had to cook, clean and get beaten up by this man. Need I say more?

I do not want to sound like a man-hater which I am not so let me clarify a few points. Its good to have expectations from people but the expectations that we have should be similar for both men and women. Notice that I have said similar and not the same because I do recognize that men and women are built differently so they do have different roles. Letting one, or both, get away with anything destroys the balance in life. I have seen people turn away from Islam just because of this double standard in their culture (read desi). If more people do the same then don’t be surprised since many people try to pass their cultural practices for the religion of Islam. I usually don’t judge people but sometimes it is necessary to judge people and when one is judging people it is helpful to use the best of yardstick. The following is my yardstick and even if you pray five times a day, have a three feet long beard, like to throw random phrases in Arabic and memorized a thousand hadiaths I won’t be impressed by your so called religiosity if you do not measure up.

Prophet Muhammad (pbuh said) “The most perfect believers are the best in conduct and best of you are those who are best to their wives. (Ibn-Hanbal, No. 7396)


{March 8, 2007}   International Women’s Day

Today is the International Women’s Day. All the sisters of the world unite!

The prevalent Zeitgeist in the world these days is what can be termed as Scientism and its twin Objectivity. This world view seems to have penetrated culture to such an extent that a large number of religious people want to prove that their religion is “scientific” or “rational.” This worldview has been challenged by Feminist Epistemologists, the idea being that the rational vs. Irrational, nature vs. culture and masculine vs. feminine dualities that form part and parcel of the modernist programme are informed by constructs of rationality and objectivity that are rooted in notions of masculinity. Although there are a number of critiques of Objectivity from a feminist perspective, the one that I shall on here is Aperspectivity i.e., the notion that one can achieve knowledge of the way things are independent of one’s relation to the things. According to Feminists there is no such thing as “the view from nowhere” and biases are necessary to get the observation off the ground. Thus consider the case of an objective (whatever that means) male observer of women, although the male can be said to objective to a certain extent, one cannot ignore that the male is likely to project his assumptions or notions of how a female is supposed to behave, onto the person that he is observing. Thus the impossibility of a truly “objective” science.

et cetera